by Janet Phelan
There are mounting concerns that the coronavirus has launched a hyperbolic response. The infection mortality rate of the virus is quite low—currently running at .26%, according to one official study: What Is The Death Rate For Covid-19 Coronavirus? What This Study Found. The death toll is also under examination, following the release of information in late August from the CDC that only about 9000 deaths were from coronavirus alone, with co-morbidities contributing to the balance of the deaths: Fauci: COVID-19 is the Killer; CDC’s Low 6% Blame on Coronavirus is ‘Confusing.” Questions about the integrity of the testing for the virus also persist: Thousands may be in pointless lockdown as major flaw found in coronavirus test.
To lock down an entire world, to destroy local economies and devastate the finances of millions, if not billions, of wage earners might be called for under a plague-like scenario, with a death rate much higher than what we are seeing reported. Unfortunately, disputes about the virtues and efficacy of mask-wearing appear to predominate in the discussion. Masks are a symptom but not the disease. They are a symptom of the effort to control and to mandate obedience. For the actual threat, we need to look further.
If the pandemic were to eventuate in a real, honest to God plague-like event, it may very well “ride in” on the purported virus, rather than have any real ties to the virus itself.
There are three potential vectors which hold out this possibility. The first one, which deals with the inherent dangers in vaccines, has been discussed thoroughly in the independent media. Vaccine horror stories indeed abound, from concerns that the adjutants used in vaccines produce neurological damage to reports of vaccine-related deaths in India: Controversial vaccine studies: Why is Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation under fire from critics in India? Given this history, the fact that the Gates Foundation is so heartily pushing the development of a coronavirus vaccine has many people understandably spooked.
While articles discussing vaccinations as a potential vector for harm now flood the independent media, there are two other portals which, given the pandemic scare at play, also need to be part of the discussion.
One vector is the effect of a quarantine, given the weaponization of the water system: US Water Systems May Be Used for a WMD Attack – Activist Post. By enforcing a stay at home quarantine on healthy people, one could argue that an attack through the water system could be facilitated — and who would ever know?
The third vector for an attack would be what are called “impostor” or “doppelganger” pharmaceuticals. This has gotten very little press coverage, due very likely to the difficulty in documenting what chemical or chemicals these impostors actually contain. It is known that the intelligence agencies in both the old USSR and in the West maintained a stash of pills that would induce death on consumption by an unwitting target. However, these doubles are now far more widely manufactured and distributed and may account for deaths not only of political targets but also the “dispensables” in nursing homes and other care facilities. Given the nature of a high-profile conservatee’s death along with the revelation that the toxicology report was removed from the coroner’s file, it is a matter of concern that Charles Castle may have expired from an “impostor”: Questions Arise as to Coroner’s Cover up in Sudden Death – Activist Post.
This reporter has a number of bottles of the “impostors” in her possession and has made strenuous outreaches to laboratories asking for an analysis. To date, no lab has agreed to tackle this.
To center the debate on “to mask” or “not to mask” is, in light of these concerns, a significant diversion. Rather than focusing on the instruments of ensuring obedience and control, the population should consider how best to survive — not only the virus itself, but the three riders coming in on these dark horses. There will likely be no official acknowledgment of any of these riders as potential weapons, as the developing narrative is repetitively geared towards “protection.”
To admit that the countermeasures — vaccines, lockdowns and your everyday pharmaceuticals — for this viral pandemic are the actual seat of the danger would be to shatter the narrative at the very juncture when it is entering high gear.
(This article originally appeared here: https://www.activistpost.com/2020/11/a-pandemic-future-may-contain-a-triangulation-of-attacks.html)